Balance Insolvency principal Tim Cook.
In the NSW Supreme Court this week iNO heard tell of a liquidator who on being presented with two options, chose a third which doesn't exist. It hasn't turned out well, though as is chronicled below, worse was averted.
The practitioner in question is Balance Insolvency's Tim Cook, and it would be remiss of us to not also mention Mills Oakley special counsel David . . .
Restricted Content
Dear Reader, this story is available only to iNO Priority subscribers. iNO Priority subscribers are entitled to exclusive access to iNO’s unique journalism and professional intelligence for fourteen days from date of publication. At that end of that 14 day period iNO’s content is released for general circulation.
If you are an existing iNO Priority holder, log in into your account to view the content, renew or amend an existing membership.
Stories published for the benefit of iNO Priority holders must not be shared, copied, reproduced or otherwise distributed without the written permission of the publisher.
Alternatively, subscribe for iNO Priority access now