Neolido fraud: Leigh paid $100k to secured creditor

PPBA is seeking to freeze assets of ex-partner David Leigh.
Neolido secured creditor

Capital Access Australia’s Tony Giustozzi.

Court documents obtained by Sydney Insolvency News reveal that ex-PPB Advisory (PPBA) partner David Leigh paid $100,000 to a secured creditor out of a total $800,000 PPBA alleges he fraudulently misappropriated from the liquidation account of Neolido Holdings.

According to an application for freezing orders filed by lawyers for PPBA last week, Leigh was questioned about the missing monies on Tuesday February 22 by PPBA Queensland partner Michael Owen and Allens’ partner Geoff Rankin.

At that interview PPBA alleges Leigh “admitted to using $700,000 of the funds to repay his own debts”, and told Owen and Rankin “there was no money left”.

While the court documents don’t detail the nature of all the debts Leigh allegedly discharged with the misappropriated monies, they do allude to a possible recipient of some of the funds.

“There appears to be a possible defence for Leigh as to $100,000 of the amount taken,” PPBA said.

“Leigh has contended that although originally transferred into a bank account controlled by him, he later paid this amount to a secured creditor of Neolido.

“The applicants have not been able to verify this with the creditor at the time of making this application.”

As reported on Wednesday in: Rivals Sense Opportunity As David Leigh Fallout Spreads the secured creditor in question is South Australian-based lender of last resort, Capital Access Australia.

CAA is part of the Capital Securities Australia (CSA) private lending group controlled by Tony Giustozzi. SiN sought comment from the champion jet boat racer and builder but he did not respond by publication deadline.

In a statement PPBA issued last Friday it described how after becoming aware of the missing funds and conducting an internal review, it satisfied itself that “this matter was isolated to the one client account. We will be fully reimbursing this valued client and have advised them of this. We are working with the client to manage the repayment.”

When SiN sought clarification in regards to whether the funds had been removed from the “Neolido liquidation account” as described in the court documents or a “client account”, or whether they were one and the same, a spokesman for PPBA suggested the “client account” expression was a “turn of phrase”.

It remains unclear whether the funds taken were at the time unattributed by the liquidators or had already designated for payment to CAA.

The distressed asset lender provided financing for Leonido’s former directors to cover a $400,000 shortfall back in 2004. The terms of the financing included a default interest rate of  5.5 per cent per month.

Currently ranking behind CAA as second secured creditor is Neovest Pty Ltd, a related party which raised $17 million from investors that was then lent to Neolido Holdings and Neo Lido Pty Ltd.

McLeod PartnersJonathan McLeod and Bill Karageozis are liquidators of Neovest. They believe their security is enforceable and Neovest is entitled to 85 cents in every dollar of the more than $4 million Sparks and Leigh have recovered as well as substantial additional recoveries likely to flow to Neolido Holdings in the future.

Gillis Delaney partner Michael Hayter who is acting for Neovest’s liquidators said the position of Neolido’s current liquidator, PPBA partner Grant Sparks, was untenable.

“There’s a clear conflict of interest and Grant Sparks should resign immediately,” Hayter said.

“Are they are expected to investigate the conduct of a friend and partner, or whether there’s been a failure in their own systems? It needs an independent liquidator to investigate what has actually occurred.

“If this was a small firm there’s no way ASIC would allow them to continue in the administration,” Hayter said.

The issue raises a conundrum for Sparks not unlike that faced by veteran liquidator Bill Hamilton when former colleague Pino Fiorentino was found by CALDB to have acted inappropriately in the matter of Ella Rouge Beauty. Hamilton as joint appointee ended up copping a suspension.

PPBA has asked the court to freeze Leigh’s assets to the value of $900,000. According to the application it has identified in particular “any money” in two Bank of Queensland accounts controlled by Leigh and a third linked to Peach Pty Ltd, trustee for the David Leigh Family Trust.

Peach Pty Limited lists an accounting firm in Port Macquarie as its registered office and it was while running the Ferrier Hodgson franchise in Port Macquarie in the 1990s that Leigh met his wife Kim.

Nicknamed Orange  by Port locals after the central NSW town were he grew up, Leigh and his wife owned a property on the mid-north coast town’s canal development, another near the Cassegrain Winery and acreage at King Creek near Wauchope.

SiN’s Northern River’s spies also said Leigh was known to fraternise with local legend and Olympic cyclist Graham Seers, who represented Australia at the 1980 Games.

Leigh left PPBA in December to join HLB Mann Judd. He has since resigned. In December he applied to the Federal Court for orders in relation to his multiple appointments as either a liquidator or bankruptcy trustee.

The schedules of resignations and appointments are listed below. PPBA’s application for freezing orders returns to the Supreme Court of Queensland on March 8.

SCHEDULE A

 

SCHEDULE B

About the Author

Peter Gosnell
Insolvency News Online illuminates the practice of insolvency in Australia's largest city, highlighting the triumphs and failures of Sydney's registered practitioners and the accounting and legal professionals who work with them. INO is produced by Peter Gosnell, former business editor and senior business reporter at The Daily Telegraph newspaper. During a decade-long career, your correspondent reported on such notable corporate collapses as HIH, One.Tel, Westpoint and Fincorp as well as some of the nation's highest profile bankruptcies and the investigations and prosecutions arising from Australia's most notorious instances of white-collar crime.

4 Comments on "Neolido fraud: Leigh paid $100k to secured creditor"

  1. I realise this article relates to a crime. But the profession (albeit small) is evidently plagued with serious physical and mental health issues based on what we’ve seen this year. Together with a parliament that seems to be moving away from the people it relies upon to assist in and ultimately supplement the enforcement of the corporations law. Worse than the NRL
    No happy editorials so far?!

  2. Roland Fong Seng Lee | 2 March 2018 at 1:00 pm | Reply

    I reiterate my earlier comments on this particular topic and its nexus to a wider malaise within the legal and accounting professions in Australia. Perhaps in Queensland more specifically.

    There is a plethora of material in the public domain (in published court material) and in the pleadings and defences of several matters that have been doing the rounds in the courts for over a decade and half which should have never in the first place been allowed to run for more than 2 years at most.

    The paucity of honest unconflicted judges, legal and accounting professionals has caused our courts to be clogged with unnecessary prolonged litigation providing rich pickings for liquidators and their legal representatives.

    This particular case with Neolido and Neovest has a nexus to the wider Mango Blvd matter which any half competent judge and accountant would have come to grips with and ended a long time ago.

    It appears that the courts are gripped with a fear of offending the big end of town that draws them into this vortex of bad judgement calls and poorer support from liquidators and accountants who are often content to sell their “expertise” in court to the highest bidder, eschewing the principles of good governance and the law.

  3. The accounts of all the liquidations and bankruptcies being handled by David Leigh should be audited. It seems improper for PPBA to retain these files in such circumstances. Transparency is imperative and forensic investigation will reveal any other accounting anomalies.

  4. ARITA has failed the profession in recent years by only looking after a clique of large legal and insolvency firms. Why no publicity about this ARITA?

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*