McEvoy Legal senior associate Raphael Grossman (R) leaving the court.
Was there ever any point applying for a suppression order over questions asked and answers provided during a public examination (PE) if you've already claimed privilege on the basis of self-incrimination?
After a few hours of deliberation McEvoy Legal senior associate Raphael Grossman decided there wasn't, advising lawyers for liquidators Peter Krejci . . .
Restricted Content
Dear Reader, this story is available only to iNO Priority subscribers. iNO Priority subscribers are entitled to exclusive access to iNO’s unique journalism and professional intelligence for fourteen days from date of publication. At that end of that 14 day period iNO’s content is released for general circulation.
If you are an existing iNO Priority holder, log in into your account to view the content, renew or amend an existing membership.
Stories published for the benefit of iNO Priority holders must not be shared, copied, reproduced or otherwise distributed without the written permission of the publisher.
Alternatively, subscribe for iNO Priority access now