Liquidator to consent to his own axing

liquidator
Jones Partners principal
Daniel Soire.
liquidator
Rodgers Reidy director Kaily Chau.

The October 10 showdown between Daniel Soire and a creditor wanting him turfed as liquidator of Technology Solutions Experts Pty Ltd (TSE) is, we are informed, off.

iNO’s sources say Soire has consented to orders soon to be made by the Federal Court’s National Judicial Registrar Peter Schmidt which will see him retire without admissions, paving the way for Rodgers Reidy director Kaily Chua to take over.

The capitulation ends several rancorous months for the Jones Partners principal, who’d accepted a referral to wind up TSE from its sole director’s husband, along with a $27,000 indemnity.

The rancour stemmed from Soire’s decision at a meeting forced on him by unrelated creditor Print Management Facilities Australia Pty Ltd (PMFA) to favour the majority votes in number over PMFA’s overwhelming majority in value on a resolution to replace him with Chua.

Foiled at the meeting PMFA sought to right its wrong in court.

This prompted Soire’s barrister Roger Marshall SC to tell Schmidt at an initial hearting that his client didn’t even know what he’s supposed to have done wrong.

Shortly after that hearing Soire’s filed a replacement DIRRI which recorded the previously omitted detail that the referrer had also paid some nominal bank charges on a credit card linked to TSE.

Initially intent on defending his position – retaining Marshall wouldn’t have been cheap – Soire has changed his mind, inviting the inference that his position was either indefensible or, and this is more likely, the bloody job wasn’t worth the aggravation.

Further reading:

Applications to replace and updates to DIRRIs

The perils of favouring majority in number

2 Comments on "Liquidator to consent to his own axing"

  1. james Johnson | 6 August 2025 at 2:42 pm | Reply

    sometimes it is best moving on to the next administration.

    There remains of course the ongoing issue of incomplete DIRRIs

  2. james Johnson | 9 August 2025 at 11:15 am | Reply

    Of course the incoming external administrator will need to remember that she represents the interests of all creditors and not just the vocal majority creditor, as to do otherwise would potentially place her in an untenable position of conflict of interest and duty

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*